No one likes an absentee parent. Those who by biology are the parents who gave life to the child and walk away. The term deadbeat seems appropriate because by ditching their responsibilities they deaden a part of their heart. Ways to be a deadbeat can include detaching themselves from the nurture of the child financially, emotionally and in physical presence that includes protection.
Soon after I became a Christian when I was young, without Christian parents teaching me the faith, I tried to construct an understanding of God’s involvement on the earth. I heard about “silent years” at times that seemed brief and made sense. One was not knowing from the Bible what happened with and through Jesus from the ages of 12 to 30. There was a guess that Jesus lived the life in all appearances of a carpenter guy who knew his Torah well. I had little problem with that since I got the sense that Jesus’ growth was a model of holiness in itself and people around him that saw it could see something good about that in hindsight.
But the longer periods were hard to swallow if God the Father is not a deadbeat to the people who were in covenant.
After Joseph in Egypt there seemed to be some prosperity and then there was oppression by Pharaoh. They suffered for 400 years until God appeared to Moses. Deadbeat there?
Not at all. During the generation that they were prospering, and after, they kept alive the covenantal understanding of what God had done with their ancestors Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. They also carried an important understanding of the involvement of the wives involved and counted their burial ground sacred. When God does show up he reveals himself to Moses and to Israel as the God of the above named. Also they were really into having babies to be in the position of getting into the land someday and filling it with their flesh and blood if they could be free. God was silent indeed but their covenant based prayers were not and God tells Moses they their cries had reached him (Exodus 3). Although it was hard, the lesson is that their being fruitful and believing in the covenant was a conversation with God where words and actions spoke equally loud. Enough that Pharaoh hated that light of increasing population and slaughtered their toddler boys.
Then as I went to bible studies I heard that their was another four hundred years of silence after the minor prophet Malachi until Jesus arrives on the scene. The deadbeat dad feel was disturbing to me there as I perceived the deist “God on the other side of the universe” in play where wisdom and miracles cease for Israel of any divine intervention worth noting. Particularly disappointing is that in salvation history there was nobody with delegated authority from God there.
But then I discovered the Catholic Church and the seven books of the Bible that were taken out in the Protestant “Reformation”. In that I realized that there were virtually no eras in those centuries without miracles, wisdom or prophecy that prepares the way for Jesus from Moses on. And of great importance was some kind of a set spiritual authority.
There was some insight on this from Rabbi Joseph H. Hertz (Mishnah, Sayings of the Fathers, 1943) “The Jews have always maintained that, along with the Law of Godwritten on stone, the oral Law or tradition was also passed down through succession from Moses. The ancient oral tradition of the Jews was codified in the Mishnah, which states, “Moses received the Torah on Sinai, and handed it down to Joshua; Joshua to the elders; the elders to the prophets; and the prophets handed it down to the Men of The Great Assembly…Simon the Just was one of the last survivors of the Great Assembly. He used to say, ‘Upon there things the world is based: upon the Torah, upon Divine service, and upon the practice of charity.’ “
And then there was the next period of God seeming to be a deadbeat: supposedly within generations after the apostles died, the gifts of the Holy Spirit ceased and any earthly based rule of faith outside of the Bible ceased. In fact, no authentic Christianity existed until God’s great “Reformation Fathers” arose in protest to that dusty man-made institution in Rome, founded by Constantine in the 4th century was confronted. The true, pure Christianity was rediscovered by these great men.
A few intellectual problems were there in some of my formation hear as well as my assumptions. These problems screamed at my much later in my Christian life.
1: The Great Apostasy happened in 325 AD. No valid Christianity until the 1500’s.
2: Yet in the late 390’s the New Testament canon of scripture was finalized.
That takes mental gymnastics right there. First, how are we to respect the canon of the NT if it was put together over 60 years after the great falling away and long before the “Reformation”?
There was was still something else that was confusing to me in the words of Jesus. For someone to consider Jesus as Lord they are choosing that as truth over him being Liar, Lunatic or Legend or a combination of the latter three. I chose Jesus because he said he would be crucified, rise from the dead and draw all men to himself. I believed he did all of the above and that the Holy Spirit empowered the apostles to teach and work with authority including for some of them to writer inspired scripture (ironically Protestant minister RC Sproul calls the Bible “A fallible list of infallible books”).
But another prophecy of Jesus was not being fulfilled if the Great Apostasy was true. Jesus said, “Upon this rock I will build my church and the gates of Hell will not prevail against it.”
For continuity to work there has to be a continued line of authority like the Mishnah alluded to above. And it was implied based on church history classes I took in a non-denominational church I went to. There were heresies that were fought against. Thank God for the Bible! Except these heresies were refuted before the Bible was established. Some more confusion there.
But after all of the gymnastics are done with this part of church history at last the heroes come that renew the true Christianity like Martin Luther and John Calvin. The problem that plagued me was that it is difficult to see salvation history being put on track by someone who was so openly anti-semitic. I did not want to believe it when as a Christian senior in high school a speaker at my school on the holocaust mentioned “On The Jews And Their Lies”. He was actually a visiting professor from a Lutheran university. Here is an excerpt.
“My advice, as I said earlier, is: First, that their synagogues be burned down, and that all who are able toss sulphur and pitch; it would be good if someone could also throw in some hellfire...Second, that all their books– their prayer books, their Talmudic writings, also the entire Bible-– be taken from them, not leaving them one leaf, and that these be preserved for those who may be converted…Third, that they be forbidden on pain of death to praise God, to give thanks, to pray, and to teach publicly among us and in our country…Fourth, that they be forbidden to utter the name of God within our hearing. For we cannot with a good conscience listen to this or tolerate it…The rulers must act like a good physician who, when gangrene has set in proceeds without mercy to cut, saw, and burn flesh, veins, bone, and marrow. Such a procedure must also be followed in this instance. Burn down their synagogues, forbid all that I enumerated earlier, force them to work, and deal harshly with them. If this does not help we must drive them out like mad dogs.”
Based on the facts above, Luther should not be called a latter apostle of grace. Not only did Luther not respect the dignity of the Jewish people but he even threw out 7 books of the Old Testament. His justification was that he was going by what the Jews in Europe told him were canonical who in turn based that opinion on a Jewish rabbinical school in Jambria in the 90’s AD. So on that he honors what Jews have to say? On scholastic opinion at the end of the apostolic age?
There is further signs that Luther was not the herald of continuity of pure Christianity. He was famous for his “5 Sola’s”. One was Sola Fide which is Latin for faith alone. He was so sure of his doctrine that he added the German word alone in his Bible translation of Galatians 3:28.
But I will return to the subject at hand. If your papist wishes to make a great fuss about the word sola (alone), say this to him: “Dr. Martin Luther will have it so, and he says that a papist and a donkey are the same thing.” Sic volo, sic iubeo, sit pro ratione voluntas. (2) For we are not going to be students and disciples of the papists. Rather, we will become their teachers and judges.
Let this be the answer to your first question. Please do not give these donkeys any other answer to their useless braying about that word sola than simply this: “Luther will have it so, and he says that he is a doctor above all the doctors of the pope.” Let it rest there. I will from now on hold them in contempt, and have already held them in contempt, as long as they are the kind of people (or rather donkeys) that they are.
Do you feel the love? So with the authority invested into himself, Luther states, “I know very well that in Romans 3 the word solum is not in the Greek or Latin text — the papists did not have to teach me that. It is fact that the letters s-o-l-a are not there.”
So if Martin Luther is addressing himself against a body of teachers that are equally arrogant and of no higher authority than him then it is the Protestant scholars fallible interpretation against those of the Catholic side.
But history does not inform us this way. Ireneus lists the order of the bishops of Rome until his time at the brink of the 3rd century with a primacy assigned to them. The aforementioned canonization of the Bible that went through an ecumenical council at Hippo in 393 and Carthage in 397 was not ratified until the Bishop [Pope] Donasus in Rome declared it in 402. This is because he was a successor to Simon Peter to whom Jesus said he would receive the keys and would be able to bind and loose which was a rabbinical term for declaring truth in faith and morals.
In coming back to the orphan point it is worth noting this scripture where Jesus is addressing his apostles, “I will not leave you orphans; I will come to you…The Advocate, the Holy Spirit that the Father will send in my name—he will teach you everything and remind you of all that [I] told you” (John 14:18, 26).
Suffice it to say, as a former Protestant who has come to the Catholic Church, I can say with confidence that Jesus leaving the Holy Spirit is on the individual and the church level in the sense of the one church that he founded and has protected from error for 2,000 years.
But the default mission in the continuity of the Church with evangelistic mission.
Go, therefore,[l] and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you.[m] And behold, I am with you always, until the end of the age” (Matthew 28:19-20).
I hope I have not offended any of my Protestant readers out there. I see God’s glory in your fellowships and that people are truly coming to a relationship with Jesus Christ. In fact, my formation as a follower of Jesus for many years was in Protestant churches including a discipline for prayer and reading the Bible and standing up for righteous causes. But the same council in Nicea of 325 that defined Jesus was 100% God and 100% man also declared “one, holy Catholic and apostolic church”. I hope somewhere out there is someone that will join with the Father’s will in all its fullness.
Truth and history have consequences. I pray for my Protestant readers that they ask of God what I did when I was in the season preceding the first insight into the Catholic Church, “Your kingdom come”. You may find, like I did, that it never left because Jesus through the Catholic Church is with us unto the end of the age.
Pope Fiction by Patrick Madrid
Upon This Rock by Steven Ray
The Fathers Know Best by James Akin
Reasons to Believe by Scott Hahn