Called to Conversion And Unity

161

Tomorrow is going to be my fifth Easter as a Catholic.  These years, from when I first investigated into the claims of the Catholic Church to my entering it, then my wife and now nearly two years of college level formation has been a whirlwind.  It has been a great ride and I am excited for what the Lord is going to do in the years to come for my family and I.  I see conversion as a continual call as a Christian to take up ones cross and follow Jesus wherever He leads.

I would like to address my anniversary as a Catholic with a different reflection for a moment.  Yes, I have a bias that the Catholic Church is awesome but I am also aware that for many Christians who are not in communion with Rome they have not yet discerned that this is their spiritual home.  So what is the meeting place I should have with Christians of good conscience that are tied to the same basics of the historic Christian faith?

I like Nicea as a meeting point.  What that is for theologians of both the Catholic and Protestant persuasions is where a council took place that elaborated on the Apostles’ Creed.  This was especially a referendum on the theology of who Christ is.

God from God, light from light, True God and True Man begotten not made.  Consubstantial with the Father He came down from heaven and by the Holy Spirit, born of the Virgin Mary He became man

As Rich Mullins said about this creed, “I did not make it.  No it is making me”.

There could be a reader of what I am writing that still is persuaded that Catholicism is not true Christianity.  For me, that is sad.  I would suggest to all of my Protestant brothers and sisters two points: I have grown closer in my relationship to Jesus Christ in these last several years and that there is more that unites us than divides us.  My love for Jesus and my neighbor has only increased.  My prayer time is better and I have a renewed love for the scriptures in engaging my faith with a good breadth of what the Catholic Church teaches.

Now more than ever, it is important that Christians learn to stand together as we consider the growing wave of persecution against Christianity across the globe.  In fact, last year there was a crucial meeting between Pope Francis and Russian Orthodox Church Patriarch Kiril in Cuba about how to find a defense for their flocks mutually.  This is a good development  when I consider how the one unanswered prayer of Jesus is “that they all be one” (John 17:21). Or in the words of Peter Kraft about ecumenism “Brothers tend to stop fighting when there is a mad man at the door”.

The Nicene Creed addresses four marks of the Church.  These are applicable for discussion whether one sees Church of church in it.  The first is “one” which I addressed above.

The second is “holy”.  This has many facets to it and in light of a recent event it worth exploring particularly with the sacramental point of view.  Recently a lifelong Protestant known as the Bible Answer Man, Hank Hennegraff, was received into the Greek Orthodox Church. Some are editorializing that he has left biblical Christianity.  For me, I admire his courage even though I am a Catholic.  Some may object to my wording but at some point he must have thought , “Here I stand, I can do no other”.  He speaks of theosis which is where Christians partake of the divine nature through communion with Christ.  He connects that in context with the Eucharist particularly.  The sacramental perspective can be verified with an open mind by reading the early church fathers and their interpretation of the New Testament which was written closer to their time than that of the reformers.

There is Catholic and then there is catholic.  Either way, I hope that Christians of good conscience can see that there is a universality to the gospel, how universally it should be proclaimed and universally experienced.

Apostolic can seem like a scary word.  Really, it does not have to be.  When the Pharisees asked Jesus by what authority he said or did things, one could say that this was healthy skepticism.  Who really wants to follow someone who made himself pastor and has a close circle of fans?  How far is that from a cult?  Apostolic succession simply means that one can trace in the authority that hands were laid on them with a sacred imparting of an anointing that started in the upper room when Jesus breathed on his apostles the Holy Spirit to represent the redemptive aspect of Him.  With the Bible Answer Man, he is going to a source that I as a Catholic would affirm has a history of guarding the deposit of faith including in the sacramental expression of Christianity.

But this is not to put down my Protestant history.  It is from my Protestant experiences I can talk about my love for bible memorization, my first zeal in pointing to Jesus and time in prayer.  I am thankful for the pastors and other loved ones that invested into me so much that I am an evangelical still albeit I believe fulfilled in that in the Catholic Church.  With a renewed fervor, I hope that increasingly my Protestant and Orthodox brothers can join me in loving each other as Jesus prayed and telling the world He is risen indeed!

One WayParadigm

exclusive-releases

“That is your truth, this is my truth”.

“There are many paths to God.  Many ways up the same mountain.”

“The times have changed.  We must get with the times.  We know so much more now than that antiquated wisdom of the past.”

These are common phrases that are said in post-modern society.  With that thinking is a common error of modernism: the wisdom of the past is not wisdom for all ages and the wisdom of this age is inherently superior because it is modern.  Where that mentality comes in with discourse in Christian circles can be stark in results.  When there is pressure to bow down to something that is in direct contradiction with Christianity often the Christian who stands firm is considered “bigoted, intolerant” etc.

Or there is another direction of compromise.  The professing Christian lets the drips of emotional blackmail to be “current” or “evolve” and gets their reward from man’s favor.

But Christianity is stubborn.  Its ways are by design to be rooted in love and hoping for eternity and far beyond what is fashionable.  St. Paul who was schooled in religion and philosophy testified to this. when he said,  “But if I should be delayed, you should know how to behave in the household of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and foundation of truth” (1 Timothy 3:15).

But this “pillar” is unmovable in calling by the nature of its Lord.  And this is the truth about Jesus in how he was always an outsider of the world with the calling to be an insider to save it: Jesus is fully God and fully man.  Theologians call the co-existing of Jesus’s natures to be the hypostatic union so that there was never a time when he was not.  Sometimes the attacks on Christianity are vicious and sometimes flattering.  Christians are called to be holy.  The world would call us stubborn.  Satan would hope to question the heavenly roots of Christian faith just as he would question the special calling of Jesus.  With the case in point below, we can see the holiness of Jesus, the founder, ironically all the more clear under temptation.

Then he took him up and showed him all the kingdoms of the world in a single instant. The devil said to him, “I shall give to you all this power and their glory; for it has been handed over to me, and I may give it to whomever I wish. All this will be yours, if you worship me.” Jesus said to him in reply, “It is written:‘You shall worship the Lord, your God,and him alone shall you serve.’” (Luke 4:5-8).

I shall give to you all this power and their glory—  The critical force of evil here is the appearance of the legitimacy of evil to be a rightful status quo.

If you worship me—  Notice that Satan does not tempt Jesus to worship only him.  But worship is to God alone.  All sacred service is unto the will of the Father.  Jesus spoke this not as just a good Bible quoter but one who has an eternal love with the Father.  What was on the horizon of this sacred and spiritual intimacy was to be shared later with a marginalized, sinful Samaritan woman.

But the hour is coming, and is now here, when true worshipers will worship the Father in Spirit and truth;[i] and indeed the Father seeks such people to worship him. God is Spirit, and those who worship him must worship in Spirit and truth.” (John 4:23-24).

Before I unpack this passage I should point to the fallacy of infinite regression.  If someone wants to argue that there is no God, they would point to the causality all in the universe.  The lines of cause have to come to an end where one traces the origins of the universe back far enough.  The stubborn atheist will even say “Well that’s just the way it is” (Bishop Robert Barron, Mystery of God, 2015).

But what about an infinite progression?  If there is a God and He is personal, would he not be worthy of worship and service?  And what could be considered a focal point for that worship and service to Deity that would be holy and personal?  Paul stated that Jesus is “the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation” (Colossians 1:15).

Jesus, though divine, is our means to meaning including truths when they are inconvenient.  The gospel is really about service and inconvenience under the motivation of true love.

“[T]herefore, he had to become like his brothers in every way, that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest before God to expiate the sins of the people. Because he himself was tested through what he suffered, he is able to help those who are being tested” (Hebrews 2:17-18).

Perhaps you are reading this and do not want to be all in to a Christianity that has Jesus as Lord with an extension of his nature through and identifiable body of believers.  How about sampling some of the nice, cuddly Jesus with “suggestions” about discipleship? This will work with goosebumps or the set of an Oprah taping but it would not be the Jesus of the gospels nor the Jesus for whom many martyrs have died.   Jesus is the Lord and Savior that calls all people to repent and be all in.

“I am trying here to prevent anyone saying the really foolish thing that people often say about Him: I’m ready to accept Jesus as a great moral teacher, but I don’t accept his claim to be God. That is the one thing we must not say. A man who was merely a man and said the sort of things Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher. He would either be a lunatic — on the level with the man who says he is a poached egg — or else he would be the Devil of Hell. You must make your choice. Either this man was, and is, the Son of God, or else a madman or something worse. You can shut him up for a fool, you can spit at him and kill him as a demon or you can fall at his feet and call him Lord and God, but let us not come with any patronizing nonsense about his being a great human teacher. He has not left that open to us. He did not intend to” (C.S. Lewis, Mere Christianity).

I’m all in.  Come and join me.  Come and follow Him.

Misunderstood At The Family Table

miscommunication

One two sides of opposing points of view try to communicate, there can be difficulties in finding the right rules of the road

Several months ago I had an interesting interchange with a woman at an ecumenical (of the nature of unifying between Christian groups) event.  There were speakers from different faith communities as well as singers.  One of the facilitators of the event asked for all of us to turn to someone we did not come with, introduce yourselves including church background and pray for each other.

The woman I paired with went first and described how she was formerly in my kind of of faith community and now was in a different one.  She described the hand of God in her life as she awakened spiritually when becoming active in the new community.  I responded essentially in turn except it as reverse:  I am a former Protestant who now identifies himself as Catholic.  If I was not speaking to her in an ecumenical event I could describe myself as still evangelical but fulfilled as a Catholic.

But this event was not mean for such wording.  The setting had the emphasis of uniting in common simplicity.  As much as I have zeal about being a Catholic I needed to respect other principles at play.

One thing that helped me from blurting out something not appropriate is that did not want to minimize her testimony that showed the Lord’s fruit.  After some years of not being active as a Catholic she found Jesus in a different setting and was revitalized.  Am I generally biased that she would be better off in the Roman Catholic Church?  Well, yes.  But what Christian is not biased about what faith community you are in?  Generally the ones that have no fuel in their fire staying our of fellowship and following Jesus in a way that is right in their own eyes.  Now that would be a horrible place to be and in some ways I have been there.  So with that nature of Christ in the backdrop we prayed for each other and she shared some words for me that she felt inspired by the Holy Spirit to say that I discerned to be from the Lord.

I have written that a scandal for the Body of Christ is that we are divided though Jesus prayed we be one.  Two people at a time, one family at a time I believe the fire of descandalizing is burning through the earth.  My sister in Christ followed a good rule of thumb by conceding for one day that the other person was right where the Lord wanted them.

But what if there is a bias from one side that there is not a present basis of unity?  In a prig blog post I wrote about the Nicene Creed being a good rallying point for unity or limus test for basic orthodoxy.

For some Christians that is not enough.  For instance, there was a semi-schism in the Catholic Church in the 1940’s that proclaimed that if one who was a non-Catholic Christian was not in full communion with the Catholic Church thus are not in God’s grace.  The pope at that time warned them to repent, they refused and were excommunicated.  On the Protestant side there are respected teachers like John Macarther who proclaim that Catholics have another gospel and only weeks after Pope John Paul II had died joked that he was in hell.  Both of these anecdotes are sad and indefensible.

So where there are growing pains in ecumenical discussion I have some suggestions for rules of the road on perception and communication.

I see dead people

If one wants to they can find martyrs on their side at the hands of the other.  Some of these points of history are facts and some of them due not hold up to scrutiny.  But if they facts of murder, hypocrisy or other sins really happened be humble.  Because among Catholics and Protestants there are plenty of anecdotes to go around.  If one looks through materials that are neutral or from the other side of the debate there will be some inconvenient points found.

Reliable teaching source

Go to the original sources of the other side is teaching as doctrine.  Going by what someone says is their doctrine, especially if it is second or third hand, is not a reliable way to see who teaches heresy.  For my faith community it is The Catechism of The Catholic Church.  If someone says something contradicting it and calls themselves a Catholic they are either poorly formed in Catholicism or are being untruthful in some way.  One person by themselves does not speak for 1,2 billion people unless you count the pope but many catholics are “cafeteria”.

A Matter of Language

Christians in the same language may speak very different dialects of “Christianese”.  So if one is alarmed by the wording of the other side, they should seek out the definition of that alarming wording in the mind of the speaker.  For example, thousands of times per day police officers “pray” to the judge.  Do they worship him?  No, they petition the judge with a old style wording of prayer.  So do the Catholics who ask for the intercession.  But in the Protestant dialect, of which I am fluent, it sounds like Mary is a goddess. There were indeed some in the 4th century who offered sacrifices to Mary but they were excommunicated by the Catholic Church.

Benefit of the doubt

This next part may cut very close to home for some readers. If one is an ex-Catholic turn Protestant or vice-versa, you may have friends and relatives who see you as “fallen away” and with that may seem overbearing.  Be patient.  There can be assumed to be some to great sincere belief on their part that if you are no in their exact kind of Christian fellowship that you are missing something. Remember that their bias is sincere and they must love you a lot or they would not be concerned.  Thank them for their concern and ask that they pray for you to discern God’s will for your life continually.

Yes, unity among Christians is a work in progress.  I believe however that Jesus is the Good Shepherd and all will be well.  Let us all, whether Catholic, Orthodox or Protestant listen to the Master’s voice.

Suggested link

http://www.john17movement.com

Mirror Image? Or Mirror Mirage?

God Allows U-Turns

I remember a few years ago how there was a lot of excitement in the first few weeks after Pope Francis was elected based on many things he said and did.  One anecdote that I recall today which did not get as much notice as it deserved was that all believers in Jesus Christ are continually called to conversion and that included the Pope himself. This statement went well with what he later answered on who is Jorge Mario Bergolio (his given name), “A sinner”.

For one to say that they are a sinner and converting may seem like two self-contradicting statements but really this is a paradox of two co-existing truths.  To be honest about ones faults and their constant need of holiness in the person of Jesus is true freedom in that the condemnation is not on you and you don’t have to expend energy on lying to yourself and/ or others on how you have it all together.

In the second to last passage in the Sermon On The Mount Jesus addresses those with a fake relationship with Jesus.  I would add that it was to those with a very convincing facade of conversation to the less discerning.

“Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father in heaven. Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name? Did we not drive out demons in your name? Did we not do mighty deeds in your name?’  Then I will declare to them solemnly, ‘I never knew you. Depart from me, you evildoers.’ (Matthew 7:21-23).

Notice that Jesus did not disagree with the facts of their case.  We could safely assume they could have given true prophesies.  So did King Saul when he took a break from trying to kill David.  So did Caiphas weeks before being party to the crucifixion of Jesus.  Judas likely drove out demons yet he was the great traitor.  To some points of view in their day they could have been called “the Lord’s announced”.  But that does not mean that they were what I would call “the Lord’s favored”.

For the people that are unconverted and have a formed enough conscience, they can compensate by lying to themselves.  In this modern age where it seems everybody is a psychologist there are excuses for being so self-absorbed and not changing to be as one is meant to be.  So if ones conscience is informed on the need to more than moral absolutes but an absolute Lord in Jesus, then there does not have to be a false prophet from outside when the one in the mirror will do just fine.

Where the false prophet of convenience will say “I’m okay, you’re okay”, one with a hardened heart will say just, “I’m okay”.  This was addressed with bad news and good news by Apostle John in his later years.

“If we say, “We are without sin,” we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. If we acknowledge our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive our sins and cleanse us from every wrongdoing.” (1 John 1:8-9).

But what if we say that we are with sin?  Then the truth is in us but not just by pulling ourselves into a Judeo-Christian moral paradigm.  If we say the opposite and the truth is in us in the meaning of the New Testament then we have Jesus in our hearts.  Jesus said “I am the way, the truth and the life.  No one comes to the Father but through me” (John 14:6).

What does Jesus mean then about doing “the will of my Father in heaven”?

Jesus answered and said to them, “This is the work of God, that you believe in the one he sent.” (John 6:29).

Jesus does not call us to demonstrate a flashy life.  Nor does he call us to live a miraculous life for miracles sake.  Jesus calls us to honesty in our need for Him.

But the tax collector stood off at a distance and would not even raise his eyes to heaven but beat his breast and prayed, ‘O God, be merciful to me a sinner.’  I tell you, the latter went home justified, not the former; for everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, and the one who humbles himself will be exalted” (Luke 18:13-14).

On a personal note.  I have been there.  I hesitate to admit it, but I may be there again.  And that is how a transformed life must be: Jesus in our hearts, renewed, so He can be more fully in our lives.

Light On Gospel of Nice

love-deception-Quotes

Truth, by very definition, supposed to be at the exclusion of other perceptions that are not truth.  The kinds of truths that make this world run on the material, philosophical and spiritual truths.  Many things that are material can challenge the intellect and are not for everyone.  Math truth seems to have waved bye-bye to me a long time ago.  But there is plenty of room for grasping philosophical and spiritual truths for the Forest Gumps and Einsteins of the world.  One of the many things I love about Jesus is that the teachings are so accessible.  When they are not there is even a follow up explanation.

But in the teachings and ultimately the authority of Jesus Christ as Lord is that in the gospels He is continually breaking ground or building something in His Church.  Jesus was not running for anything but the cross by which He would redeem the world as the atoning Lamb of God and form a holy community.

But in casting a vision of truth in the Sermon On The Mount Jesus knew that there were deceivers coming to people in the assembly of the day and of days to come so He addresses this.

“Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but underneath are ravenous wolves. By their fruits you will know them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? Just so, every good tree bears good fruit, and a rotten tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a rotten tree bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire. So by their fruits you will know them” (Matthew 7:15-20).

Beware of false prophets— Obviously they could be ones who predict something and it does not happen.  But comparing within the same book of Matthew we see in chapter 24 that there would be ones who say, “I am the Christ”.  They are wanting to be the beginning and end of God’s kingdom in place of Jesus.  Jesus is unique and anyone trying to usurp that and elicit worship that belongs only to Him is false where Jesus is truth.

come to you in sheep’s clothing—- Many Christian may know a thing or two from when they have seen deceivers come into the world or even into Christian fellowship.  In the first appearance they seem good.  Maybe they do some good works or speak a dialect of “Christian-ese” fluently.  A deceiver that draws people from the simplicity and devotion to Jesus may fool some leaders some of the time even.

But what are some basic fruits that Jesus says we should look for?  We are informed on what to look for in John 10.

“Amen, amen, I say to you, whoever does not enter a sheepfold through the gate but climbs over elsewhere is a thief and a robber. But whoever enters through the gate is the shepherd of the sheep. The gatekeeper opens it for him, and the sheep hear his voice, as he calls his own sheep by name and leads them out. When he has driven out all his own, he walks ahead of them, and the sheep follow him, because they recognize his voice. But they will not follow a stranger; they will run away from him, because they do not recognize the voice of strangers.”

So Jesus said again, “Amen, amen, I say to you, I am the gate for the sheep. All who came [before me] are thieves and robbers, but the sheep did not listen to them.  I am the gate. Whoever enters through me will be saved, and will come in and go out and find pasture.  A thief comes only to steal and slaughter and destroy; I came so that they might have life and have it more abundantly. I am the good shepherd. A good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep. A hired man, who is not a shepherd and whose sheep are not his own, sees a wolf coming and leaves the sheep and runs away, and the wolf catches and scatters them. This is because he works for pay and has no concern for the sheep.” (John 10:1-5, 7-13).

We learn here that they get among God’s people without respect to the authority of Jesus.  We learn later in the gospels that Jesus delegates authority to others who likewise pass it on to others. It could be implied that they are the “gatekeeper”.   If someone is self-appointed and wants to exercise new truth we ought to be alert right there.  What we also see is that they will not have a healthy view or endurance when hardships come like the specter of death or persecution.  Whereas the DNA of the Church that Jesus builds is that it is “the pillar and foundation of truth”.  Jesus and the true gatekeepers will open and close the books on truth without error but the false shepherds will pollute everything.

I would like to point to the life versus destruction that Jesus speaks of.  Life more abundantly respects the dignity of the human soul and body.  If the reader here is checking out Christianity, take a look at the fruits of its teachings when followed correctly.  I emphasize “when followed correctly” because, as GK Chesterton said, one should judge a medicine for when it is taken.  Christianity, as can be seen in history, supports real life in all its forms.  Moral relativism will only plant ones feet firmly—in mid-air.  Its fruit is death to the dignity of the person and the family.

Last, on discernment, I challenge the reader to be careful about their sources in light of the real deal of Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition.  Do your influences state something about right living based mostly on “I feel”?  At the time that I write this there has been a Supreme Court decision that has ruled that same-sex marriage must be recognized as a constitutional right.  I am seeing on Facebook many Christians who have openly defied Jesus the Shepherd under the “Gospel of Nice” with the new holy sacrament of “I’m okay, your okay”. They celebrate the ruling for the wisdom of the age in place of the wisdom of the ages. If for a moment someone begins to wonder if they have been deceived, look at the fruit of the prophets of this age.  What is the fruit of no-fault divorce and later remarriage?  What is the fruit of abortion with the people involved?  The wisdom of the age seemed so convincing at the time. Could the fruit be bad in the long run about gay marriage if natural law and spiritual law is violated.  I have my not so wile guess.

Make no mistake: sheep are dumb.  We need Jesus and His chosen, broken servants to walk right and not the false prophets of moral relativism scattered in the media. It is up to each of us to see truth with the right eyes.

True Religion In The Time Of Paris

Jenga

As I write this there has been a recent series of terror attacks in France.  There has been talk about cultural sensitivity, freedom of expression and xenophobia since it was someone using their freedom of expression in a way that conflicted with someone’s religious point of view that precipitated the violence.

Such a conflict has prompted some people like comedian and social commentator Bill Maher to call religion the cause of evil and to be abandoned for the good of all.  After all, aren’t all religions alike?  Don’t they all involve hypocrisy when they say it is about perfection?

I will address the first question by saying that all religions have certain similarities in that, with one exception, they either collapse on themselves or contradict themselves in their most fundamental characteristics.  The reason why the do that is in that they do not have a balanced foundation of putting ones self last in light of both a Higher Power and their fellow human beings.  Within the religion of secular humanism there is the cry of justice from within its trinity of class, race and gender for revenge that calls itself justice.  Within pantheistic religions there is a disposable view of ones fellow man since reincarnation means being recycled.

The place to find such a balance is in what theologians call salvation history which can be defined as the successive line of unfolded truth and divine relationship initiative from Abraham until today as the Judeo-Christian body of faiths.  People that study the Old and New Testaments may wrongly come of the conclusion that it is alright to cherry pick from the wording in the Old Testament but not all or one could be extreme like the terrorists of the radical expression of militant Islam.  If those critics are right then this Judeo-Christian salvation history is like a door that falls off and gives one no proper entry way to this spiritual house.

However, I would posit that this door does not fall off because the hinge that it turns on is solid and keeps it on track and His name is Jesus Christ.  Remember, that the collapses of religions around the world happen because of a deficit in regard to the Higher Power and ones fellow human being.  Jesus Christ stands as both God and man, the main ingredients or subjects of discussion important and offers disciples past and present the opportunity to be connected to Him

Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth pass away, not one letter, not one stroke of a letter, will pass from the law until all is accomplished. Therefore, whoever breaks one of the least of these commandments, and teaches others to do the same, will be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever does them and teaches them will be called great in the kingdom of heaven.  For I tell you, unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven (Matthew 5:17-20).

Please notice how this passage answers the first question.  That is because we know that Jesus said when asked about the greatest commandment that it was to love God with all your heart, soul, mind and strength with the second to love your neighbor as yourself.  As for the terms “abolis” versus “fulfill” it is about this love being brought out for the world to know in His coming in baptism and perfected in suffering on the cross.  This is His ultimate commitment to us and surrender to the Father’s love for the world.

Now since this is born out, so a Christian believes, through the Christian people then one would think that hypocrisy should not be an issue.  I can say for sure that it is a problem but I am not seeing Jesus as an ineffective leader.  The reason is that when Christian hypocrites rise up, and I would call myself both at times, there is a point of reference in the life and teachings of Jesus Christ to come back to.  And there are always standard bearers that will lead such a believer, and an honest inquiring unbeliever straight home.  Such a home is referred to in other scripture as follows.

“… may know how one ought to behave in the household of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and bulwark of the truth. Without any doubt, the mystery of our religion is great:

He was revealed in flesh,

vindicated in spirit,

seen by angels,

proclaimed among Gentiles,

believed in throughout the world,

taken up in glory.

So if you are reading this and wonder what good can be found in being a Christ follower and do so fully then I would say it is fine to be skeptical.  Be open minded in thinking about where your paradigms come from.  Just do not be a cynic and thus a disciple of Bill Maher. For if you consider what you may be missing, the joke could really be on you.